Carthage & Hannibal
Edition: Carthage & Hannibal: The Rise and Fall of Rome’s Greatest Rival — ManyPasts YouTube release published on 18 September 2026 (Z96UF-uGRLQ), the 2026 remake. Earlier uploads of the first cut are no longer available.
pp. 54–56: plan, commercial quay and discussion of stone shipshed dating. Partial excavation; do not project final harbour architecture into ninth-century foundation.
Published chapter summary: continuity of Tyre, Sidon and Byblos from Late Bronze Age. Summary consulted; does not establish a single migration or homogeneous ancestry.
City identities, Greek name, material exchange, dye and western settlement. Purple etymology qualified; do not turn a network into one nation.
2014 manuscript study; abstract. Challenges evidence used for a collective Canaanite self-name.
23.740–749: Sidonian silver bowl. Greek literary representation; no actual surviving object identified as this bowl.
15.415 onward: Eumaeus's narrated childhood. Literary stereotype; not an ethnic characterization by this film.
Walters 54.2335A: tribute bearers and inscription naming Tyre and Sidon; upper fragment in the acquired two-fragment photograph. Assyrian royal representation. The lower fragment, 54.2335B, depicts soldiers carrying logs and is not the tribute scene. The specific combined Commons photograph remains CC BY-SA 3.0 despite other museum image downloads being offered as CC0.
Wreck structure and illustrated archaeological evidence. Small wreck is a construction reference only; our 22m merchant vessel is a generic composite, not a scale reconstruction of Mazarrón II.
Foundation, destruction, subsequent Roman city and surviving site. Modern site includes several periods.
Chronology: foundation tradition and Numidian/Carthaginian context. Does not imply an empty North Africa before settlement.
Punic house passage and figure 6, early second century BCE. Narrow plots and covered cisterns supported; upper walls, furnishings and our open-cistern maintenance view are interpretive.
Carthage, political institutions and wealth. Greek analytical perspective, not a complete constitutional archive.
First Punic War; peace; subsequent mercenary conflict. Ancient retrospective narrative; film avoids unsupported exact casualty totals.
2.1 and 2.13: Barcid Iberia. Interpretations of motive remain qualified.
Causes, Saguntum, march, Alps and Roman response. No exact pass claimed; inner thoughts and reported speeches are not invented as direct testimony.
Histories III.107–118. Schematic formation, not exact headcounts or surveyed positions. Existing African proxy is not an exact Iberian/Celtic central contingent.
Introduction summary: Cannae, defection/reconquest and Italian communities. Published introduction consulted, not a claim of reading full monograph. Political network is an interpretive organizing argument, not a single-cause proof.
Scipio and New Carthage. Lagoon crossing explicitly attributed to Polybius (10.8–15). The hydrological mechanism is disputed; schematic lagoon illustration is not an asserted tidal simulation.
Iberian campaign, Ilipa. Campaign overview, not exact tactical reconstruction.
15.9–19: Zama, Masinissa and peace terms. Do not collapse the 202 BCE defeat into 146 BCE destruction.
96: harbours; 127–135: final siege and aftermath. Later author; vivid siege details not automatically treated as eyewitness certainty.
Existing frozen pilot relief, USGS/NOAA/EU-DEM/Copernicus. Modern terrain; existing Alps clip has fourfold vertical exaggeration.
9.3–7: relief of Capua, forage, cavalry and march towards Rome. Retrospective Greek narrative. Siege perimeter and march arrows are explanatory, not surveyed positions.
26.7–16: march on Rome and surrender of Capua. Roman literary account, composed later; details differ from Polybius.
Demand to abandon Carthage and settle inland. Later account, not a surviving contemporary ultimatum.
95–96: Carthage topography and harbours. Interpret alongside partial excavation; not evidence for ninth-century architecture.
121: defenders cut another outlet while Roman works close the harbour. New outlet shown only schematically. Precise ancient shore alignment is not established by modern OSM.
Final assault, Byrsa and enslavement. Later literary narrative; no invented eyewitness scenes or exact casualty totals.
Trans. J. S. Watson (1853). Elissa (Dido) and the foundation of Carthage, including the oxhide legend the film illustrates.
Molecules 6 (2001), 736–769. Source for Friedländer’s extraction of about 1.4 g of dye from 12,000 snails.
PLOS ONE 19(6), e0304340 (2024). Late Bronze Age purple-dye production at Cape Kolonna, Aegina; source of the shell and pigment photographs.
Trans. Horace White. §93, the workshops, is quoted in the film.
Latin text. Scipio’s African campaign and Hannibal’s recall, alongside Polybius XV and Appian.
These notes preserve the research and asset register behind the documentary, published under its YouTube title after development as Purple & Iron. Ancient literary accounts, surviving objects and modern reconstructions provide different kinds of evidence.
Modern landscapes, ports, crops, craft work and animals illustrate places and material subjects. They are not footage of ancient events. Modern coastlines and terrain remain geographical context, not reconstructed ancient shorelines.
Routes, regional influence areas and battle formations are schematic. Their geometry, changing coverage, colours and numbers of figures do not establish surveyed borders, exact troop positions, uniforms or headcounts. No single Alpine pass is claimed; the inherited Alpine terrain illustration uses fourfold vertical exaggeration.
The circular harbour model concerns later Punic Carthage, not its ninth-century foundation. Buildings, streets and elevations remain interpretive. The merchant ship is a generic Mediterranean composite rather than a replica of the much smaller Mazarrón II wreck. The house and open cistern explain domestic water storage without claiming a specific household.
Capua and New Carthage are explanatory landscapes. Polybius is explicitly the source of the lagoon-crossing account; the mechanism remains disputed. Shores, terrain, streets, walls and attack routes are illustrative. The lagoon graphic is not a tidal simulation or a measured depth model.
Later portraits are not contemporary likenesses. The Balawat relief is an Assyrian royal representation; Modern photographs and crops retain their individual attribution and licences; no institutional endorsement is implied.
The oxhide sequence illustrates the foundation legend recorded by Justin; it is not a measured reconstruction of Dido’s land or a claim that the event occurred. The Carthaginian reach overlay shows approximate holdings and influence. Polybius III.22–24 distinguishes treaty claims in Libya and Sardinia from only the Carthaginian parts of Sicily, and no exact frontier is asserted.
The African campaign maps distinguish Scipio’s crossing in 204 BCE from Hannibal’s recall in 203 BCE. Movement curves are geographical explanations, not recovered sailing tracks or exact daily positions.
The harbour siege follows Appian, The Punic Wars 119–125: the land blockade, the attempted mole, the new outlet, the sortie and the naval engagement three days later. The exact outlet, mole, quay, shore defences, ships, deployment and vessel counts are illustrative, and ship colours identify sides editorially.
The three spoken quotations are readings of historical translations, not recordings or reconstructions of the authors’ voices: Aristotle, Politics II.11 (Benjamin Jowett); Polybius, Histories III.85.4 (W. R. Paton, 1922), Hannibal’s appeal as Polybius reports it; and Appian, The Punic Wars §93 (Horace White).
Modern Carthage harbour setting. Cropped, graded and animated with explanatory overlays, then dissolved into the interpretive reconstruction (approximate registration, not a surveyed footprint). Modern roads and buildings do not establish the ancient layout.
Modern collection shell of a dye-producing species, not an excavated specimen or Friedländer’s experimental species. Cropped and composited.
A single modern specimen, cropped and composited; not one of Friedländer’s experimental specimens.
Modern harbour, buildings and vessels; cropped, graded and animated.
Modern photograph of the Punic quarter and later Roman remains. Cropped, graded and animated.
Modern photograph. Cropped, graded and animated.
Assyrian royal representation; the tribute fragment is identified by its Tyre/Sidon inscription. Cropped, colour balanced and reframed across the upper tribute register.
Comparative material object, not Homer’s bowl. Cropped/reframed.
Material comparison, not a coin assigned to an Iberian mine or a specific military payment. Cropped and animated.
A later imagined likeness; the sculpture shows Hannibal counting rings after Cannae. Cropped/reframed for the portrait.
Late Bronze Age finds from Cape Kolonna, Aegina, not Tyrian or Carthaginian excavations. Coarse fraction cropped, not recoloured.
Cape Kolonna, Aegina, Late Bronze Age. Upper-left interior surfaces only; cropped/reframed without recolouring.
Cropped, graded and animated with a mosaic reveal. Identification is uncertain; the film says “possibly Scipio”.
Obverse cropped and graded; the uncertain attribution is kept on screen.
Modern view from Reggio Calabria towards Sicily. Cropped, reframed and captioned.
Modern view from Sicily towards Calabria. Cropped, reframed and captioned; not evidence of an ancient city plan.
A literary imagining, not a measured ancient city plan.
A later scene from Dido’s legend.
Monochrome reproduction of a later history painting.
Romantic imagining; not evidence for a specific pass or weather event.
Nineteenth-century traveller’s view of Tyre.
Aristotle is the living figure and Homer the bust; both are later imagined portraits.
Modern Mallorca; sea insert and title sea. Modern footage, selected, trimmed, muted, cropped or graded; it does not document an ancient event.
Modern Swiss Alps; no identified Hannibal pass. Modern footage, selected, trimmed, muted, cropped or graded; it does not document an ancient event.
Current craft tools and methods. Modern footage, selected, trimmed, muted, cropped or graded; it does not document an ancient event.
Modern footage, selected, trimmed, muted, cropped or graded; it does not document an ancient event.
Modern footage, selected, trimmed, muted, cropped or graded; it does not document an ancient event.
Modern brewery grain handling. Modern footage, selected, trimmed, muted, cropped or graded; it does not document an ancient event.
Modern harvest equipment. Modern footage, selected, trimmed, muted, cropped or graded; it does not document an ancient event.
Modern footage, selected, trimmed, muted, cropped or graded; it does not document an ancient event.
Illustrative forage, not ancient breeds or the landscape of Capua. Modern footage, selected, trimmed, muted, cropped or graded; it does not document an ancient event.
Modern relief and coastline; the Alpine terrain insert exaggerates relief for illustration.
A cartographic aid, not reconstructed ancient coastlines.
Artistic light and reflections only, not evidence for ancient weather. CC0 surface textures are retained with the procedural environments.
For source questions or corrections, contact support@manypasts.com.
We distinguish surviving evidence from interpretation and visual reconstruction. Maps can represent approximate routes or relationships without claiming to trace a surveyed ancient road. Modern landscapes and illustrative models are identified as such.
Map explorations include their own sources and model limitations. These remain separate from the final film’s research and production approvals.
Open the companion map (members)